The Greatest Hits of Edgar Allan Poe

Edgar Allan Poe (1809-1849) was born today, January 19. There are few writers who have had the influence of Poe. He cast a long shadow over his contemporaries, as I discussed here. He was one of the greatest scribes of darkness. And his work is dark.

But it’s also very, very good.

So many of his tales, poems, and stories are classics. “The Raven”. “The Fall of the House of Usher”. “The Pit and the Pendulum”. “The Cask of Amontillado”. “The Murders in the Rue Morgue”. “The Gold-Bug”. The Masque of the Red Death”. “The Premature Burial”. “The Black Cat”. “The Tell-Tale Heart”.

So let me throw this question out. If you were going to put together a collection Poe’s best works, a greatest hits collection, if you will, what would you include, and why?

8 thoughts on “The Greatest Hits of Edgar Allan Poe

  1. Mike Tuggle

    It’s hard to go wrong with any of Poe’s masterworks. However, I think any collection that left out “The Cask of Amontillado” would miss the mark. That tale sweeps the helpless reader up and carries him to a conclusion that, once it’s done, seems inevitable. No one has ever matched it.

    Reply
    1. Keith West Post author

      Agreed. My son had to read it for English class a couple of years ago. I reread it and had a wonderful discussion about it with him.

      Reply
  2. Matthew

    I think the ones you listed would be great for his best of book.

    Not to long ago I read The Narrative A Gordon Pym.

    Reply
  3. deuce

    Well, I’ve always been partial to “ulalume”. EAP was an exceptional poet, IMO. Also, I do think that THE NARRATIVE OF A. GORDON PYM deserves more love. While it has its flaws, it is also the first fairly successful SFF adventure novel in the English language–I don’t count GULLIVER’S TRAVELS. Poe swung for th bleachers. He may not have hit a home run, but he deserves major credit for swinging as is. Verne was a HUGE fan of the novel. He even wrote a sequel.

    Reply
    1. Keith West Post author

      I have a great deal of respect for writers who stretch themselves, even if they aren’t entirely successful in what they are attempting. See Teddy Roosevelt’s “Man in the Arena” speech for a good explanation of that:

      It is not the critic who counts, not the one who points out how the strong man stumbled or how the doer of deeds might have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred with sweat and dust and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs and comes short again and again; who knows the great enthusiasms, the great devotions, and spends himself in a worthy cause; who, if he wins, knows the triumph of high achievement; and who, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who know neither victory nor defeat.

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *