Thinking of Leigh Brackett

Today is December 7, and that means it’s the birthday of Leigh Brackett (1915-1978).

Just a heads-up, this isn’t going to be a typical birhtday post. It’s going to be a little freewheeling, and I’m going to vent my spleen a bit near the end.

Brackett is a major favorite around here. She started out in the pulps, writing what has become known as sword and planet with a hardboiled twist.

She also wrote hardboiled detective stories. One day I’m going to do a series of posts on her detective fiction. But today is not that day.

Howard Hawks supposedly read one of her novels and told his secretary or executive assisstant, “get me this guy Brackett.” He was shocked when a woman walked in.

That’s Brackett in front of the lamp, workiing on the script of The Big Sleep.

This led to Brackett working on the screenplay of Raymond Chandler’s The Big Sleep, starring  Humphrey Bogart and Lauren Bacall.  Bogey and Bacall are on the sofa in  the photo on the left. Brackett is the woman to their left with her head down.

Brackett was in the middle of a novella, “Lorelei of the Red Mist”, one of her best stories. She couldn’t finish it and work on the script for The Big Sleep. Screenwriiting  was a full time  job that paid a much better rate than the pulps. So, she called her young friend Ray Bradbury and asked him to fiinish it for her.

It was published in Planet Stories. That’s the cover there on the right. It is one of Brackett’s most powerful stories. And it didn’t suffer from Bradbury’s assist. Brackett, as well as Henry Kuttner, was mentoring Bradbury in writing at the time.

Brackett went on to have a very successful writing career in Hollywood. She wrote the screenplay for Rio Bravo as well as several other John Wayne films. I’m going to assume that pretty much everyone reading this post knows she had completed the first draft of the screenplay The Empire Strikes Back before her death.  There’s a reason Empire is the strongest installment of the original trilogy.

l. to r., Leigh Brackett, Ray Bradbury, Bradbury’s wife, Edmond Hamilton

Brackett was married to Edmond Hamilton, another favorite around here. Their marriage would make the topic of another post. Again, that’s for another day.

Brackett developed a solar system in which all the terrestrial planets had indigenous life, as well as some of the larger moons of the gas giants. It was a wild, exotic place, with savages on Mercury and Mars, and jungles on Venus.

Many of the settings and aliens in Brackett’s work are pretty standard tropes from the science fiction of that era. Hackneyed would be a good term to describe them if a writer tried to use them today. But in Brackett’s hands, those tropes were magic.

One thing about much of Brackett’s work is that it contains a sadness and an undercurrent of tragedy inherent in the settings and situation, especially her stories of Mars. See “The Last Days of Shandakar” as an example. Other examples include “The Dacing Girl of Ganymede” and the aforementioned “Lorelei of the Red Mist”.

Brackett’s work had a sense of adventure that I don’t see much today. I may simply be missing it. I’ve not had time to de a great deal of reading, especially since I got back into academia. Plus, I’ve been reading mostly mysteries and thrillers the past few years.

Which brings me to my spleen venting. I will tie this post back into Brackett before the end, I promise. I’ll stick in some Brackett covers to break up the text a little.

I’m not going to vent about Brackett, but about the lack of her and other writers. What I am addressing is traditional publishing, not indie publishing.

There’s been some discussion on X (formerly Twitter) over the last few weeks or months about why men and boys aren’t reading. The concensus among those who aren’t in the trad pub bubble know that really isn’t the case.

Men are reading. They jjust aren’t reading the pablum provided by New York.

I have mostly stayed out of these discussions.

Then today someone posted a link to an op-ed in The New York Times. I won’t provide a link because I didn’t read the article. I had to sign up for an account to access the article. Nope, not gonna do it.

The quote I saw nearly killed brain cells, it was so stupid. The author of the article said “I welcome the end of male dominance in literature. Men ruled the roost for far too long, too often at the expense of great women writers who ought to have been read instead…Furthermore, young men should be readng Sally Rooney and Elena Ferrante. Males readers don’t need to be parided with male writers.”

I’m not sure where to start witih that stupdity, but I’ll try.

First, men don’t rule the roost in traditional publishing. The industry is ninety-soemthing percent women. The exact number varies a bit depending on who is doing the counting, but it can’t be argued that traditional publishing isn’t controlled by women.

Second, who is the author of this piece of drivel to say women writers should be read instead of men? (I haven’t seen the name of the author.) I thought it was up to the reader to decide which writer to read.

I had never heard of Sally Rooney or Elena Ferrante. I looked them up on Aamzon so you don’t have to.

You’re welcome.

(Now I’m going to have to do searches for Lovecraft, Howard, and L’Amour to keep those women’s books and others like them from showing  up in my reccomendations.)

These are women writers who write about women. Their relationships with each other. Their relationships with each other’s  husbands. Their books sound like deep introspective nanvel gazing about real people living real ives in the real world.

No thanks, I want imaginary worlds. Action. Adventure. Women to be rescued, not strong grrll bosses.

I would almost bet money that their works will be forgotten in a few decades from now. Just like many best-sellers of the past have been.

If these are the attitudes and the product of New York publishing, it is no wonder trad pub is dying.

But I don’t believe men aren’t reading, although I think reading is definitely in decline among younger people. I had a university student a few days ago tell me he never read unless he had to.

Men are reading, they just aren’t reading what the wokescolds in New York are telling them to. Men are reading Howard and Lovecraft, Burroughs and Haggard, L’Amout and Chandler, Hammett and Spillane.

Leigh Brackett and C. L. Moore. Kristine Kathyrn Rusch.

And we have indie. I’m not even going to attempt to name indie writers. There are too many of them, and I haven’t been able to keep up with them for the last few years. It is a golden age of exciting fiction.

Brackett wrote what men and women want to read.

A compelling story about men and women striving to survive in a dangerous world. And if Brackett’s heroes are a little worn and wounded and world-weary, so much the better.

People don’t read to be miserable.  They don’t read to be enlightened about the human condition or to have their consciousness raised. They certainly don’t read to be preached to and told their interests aren’t valid or that they’re what’s wrong with society.

And as for I should be reading a certain author that trad pub wants to push, I say I’ll read whatever I damn well please.

And that will certainly include Leigh Brackett.

7 thoughts on “Thinking of Leigh Brackett

  1. Jeff Baker

    One of my favorite Brackett-related books was an anthology: “The Best Of Planet Stories Volume #1.” She may have just written the intro and it includes at least one of her tales. There were supposed to be more volumes but they never saw the light of day (or light of Mars…) And if you get a chance read the intros to “The Best of Leigh Brackett” and “The Best of Edmond Hamilton.” They did the intros for the others books and they are sweet, funny and informative. I hear they were too!

    Reply
    1. Keith West Post author

      I pick up THE BEST OF PLANET STORIES whenever I run across a copy, which hasn’t been for some years now. And THE BEST OF LEIGH BRACKETT soon followed by THE BEST OF EDMOND HAMILTON were, I think, the third and fourth Best of volumes I bought when I joined the Science Fiction Book Club the summer before I entered high school. The introductions to both of those books were great.

      Reply
  2. Matthew

    I think Brackett was probably more influential than well-known. Pulp and Golden Age Hollywood aficionados know who she is, but she is as well known to the average person as say Isaac Asimov. Yet, she influenced Star Wars by both writing ESB and her fiction probably before that. Han Solo was a very Brackettesque character. She deserves more recognition.

    I think of Brackett as the most masculine female writer. Her stories are all about tough guys whether they are space smugglers, hard boiled detectives, or John Wayne.

    When gender and politics meet things get weird and simplistic. I don’t like either Gloria Steinem or Andrew Tate. I think it is more important that men are masculine than women are feminine. For some weird reason women who deviate from the feminine norms do better than men who deviate from masculine norms. I am trying to figure out why. I think it is just that the traits we associate with masculinity are very utilitarian even when they are possessed by a female. So that a tomboy, for lack of a better term, is useful, but an effeminate man is not. Quite often men who are not masculine often lack the feminine virtues as well. (I. e. they are both very wimpy, but lack empathy for example.)

    Reply
    1. Keith West Post author

      I could write a whole essay agreeing with you, but I won’t. At least for now. Brackett’s influence is certainly there, and it still shows up from time to time. I think your comments on gender are spot-on.

      Reply
    1. Keith West Post author

      That’s one of the few Brackett books I haven’t read. I’ve been meaning to get to it for years and just haven’t.

      Reply
  3. Pingback: Sensor Sweep: Edgar Rice Burroughs, Claw, Wulfwald – castaliahouse.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *